Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Academic Performance: Comparison be-tween Systems Engineering and Nursing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63728/riisds.v10i1.56

Keywords:

Problem Based Learning, Academic performance, University disciplines, Practical skills, Adaptive methodology

Abstract

This study compares the impact of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on the academic performance of students in different university disciplines, specifically in systems engineering and nursing, based on the studies by Alejos (2017) and Lujan (2018). While in the context of engineering programming PBL did not show significant improvements in performance, in the specialty of geriatrics for nursing students notable increases in grades and a positive perception of learning were observed. This contrast suggests that PBL might be more effective in areas where hands-on learning and collaboration are essential, such as in health sciences. The findings indicate that the PBL methodology promotes the acquisition of practical and teamwork skills, relevant characteristics in health training. On the other hand, in technical and structured disciplines, such as programming, a pedagogical approach that combines elements of PBL with traditional methods seems to be required to better respond to the sequential and logical nature of the subject. In conclusion, PBL is valuable in specific contexts and must be adapted to the disciplinary profile and needs of each area of ​​study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2003). Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context-problem-based learning. Cell Biology Education, 2(2), 73–81.

Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2013). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 409–432.

Dolmans, D. H., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2005). Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.

Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van Den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1).

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.

Yew, E. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative processes in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 251–260.

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Gálvez-Rodríguez, A., Álvarez-Valenzuela, R., López-López, J. de J., & Espinoza-Carlón, J. L. (2024). Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Academic Performance: Comparison be-tween Systems Engineering and Nursing. Revista Interdisciplinaria De Ingeniería Sustentable Y Desarrollo Social, 10(1), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.63728/riisds.v10i1.56

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.